21 June 2026
Recruitment agencies still charge 15%–25% of salary per hire — often £6,000–£25,000 that delivers zero value to your employees.
Direct‑to‑employer hiring changes that.
It removes the middleman and lets employers reinvest those savings directly into their people.
And crucially:
This is hiring as it should be: transparent, fair, human.
.jpg)
The Impact of Saved Recruiter Fees.
Direct‑to‑employer hiring flips the model.
Remove the middleman → reinvest the savings → change lives.
One saved recruiter fee can:
And because candidates apply directly, employers get truer signals, better matches, and higher retention.
.jpg)
Most UK graduates leave university with £45,000–£50,000 in student loan debt.
A single saved recruiter fee could fund:
This is how employers win Gen Z talent — with fairness, transparency, and real support.
.jpg)
Full‑time childcare in London now costs £19,000 per year.
Redirecting one recruiter fee could:
This is how employers retain experienced talent in a competitive market.
.jpg)
Instead of paying agencies, employers can invest in:
This is how modern employers build loyalty — by putting people first.
.jpg)
Kaplunk’s category — direct‑to‑employer hiring — is built on:
Explore the shift:
The Direct‑to‑Employer Operating System The Direct‑to‑Employer OS | The New Operating System for Modern Hiring
See why agencies no longer fit modern hiring:
Why Recruitment Agencies Are Becoming Obsolete Are Recruitment Agencies Obsolete? What’s Replacing Them (2026)
Understand the movement behind it:
The Rise of Ethical Hiring in 2026 The Rise of Ethical Hiring in 2026 | Transparent & Fair Recruitment
.png)
Every recruiter fee is a missed opportunity to invest in your workforce.
Saved recruiter fees are a win for employers and a win for applicants.